The infinite
whole, the Real; that which one witnesses in a shadowy form, but not even the
shadow itself, just a glance. This
discussion (among psychoanalysts and philosophers) witnesses to something
bothersome to me. As I consider the
ability to grasp concepts larger than or beyond our capacities as persons, I am
reminded of how liminal these ideas are for those who understand personhood to be primarily informed by basic survival
techniques. I am reminded that appropriate
food, shelter, safety and physical health are preliminary conditions that
persons seek. But, there is something
which I believe must be attended to before these can even be considered; it is
psychological certainty. The question
is: where does one find the source that fulfils such a need. Certainty
is not to be found in the imaginary, or in the symbolic. In other words, those things that are
represented to us, impressions of the inner and outer world, are fluid,
intangible, and lead to uncertainty. So
the source cannot be found, unless we experience it as real. Real is an order
or register that Jacques Lacan theorized, as well the Imaginary and Symbolic. Conceptually we have an object of desire, all
of us do, and the seeking of the object our desire is fundamental to our
existence. The flash of terror which happens
just behind me indicates to me that there is something I desire which I can
only see vaguely, over my shoulder at a glance.
I need not seek my desire though, because it is in search of me.
Chris,
ReplyDeleteIs your point that those who argue for an infinite Real do so while simultaneously articulating personhood in mere naturalistic terms, which in the end is contradictory? To pursue the Real is already to assent to a metaphysical reality that defines personhood apart from subjective naturalistic descriptions.
Yes there could possibly be something like a Real pursuing the narrator, but assent to it is not happening for that person. The only conceivable person-hood is naturalistic. Does there necessarily have to be an "end" ???
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like "we see through a glass darkly;" that's why we need revelation, right? RB
ReplyDeleteWell, it would seem that way, but I think the narrator is struggling with seeing any enlightened state at all. The whole narrative demonstrates that there is a fear behind that person which that person would not like to meet at this time, or ever.
ReplyDelete